SURINDER SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5642/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010256252024

Filing Number

CWP/20456/2024

Filing Date

19-Jun-2024

Registration No

CWP/5642/2024

Registration Date

20-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kumar Sharma,Rajani Kumari,Rajani Kumari, ,Rajani Kumari

  2. 2.Jit Singh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Harjeet Kaur(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Mohinder Singh(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Shadi Lal(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Arun Kumar Kalia(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Kamlesh Kumari(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Gurdyal Singh Saini(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Rajesh Kumar Joshi(Not Applicable)

  10. 10.Neelam Sharma(Not Applicable)

  11. 11.Ashwani Kumar(Not Applicable)

  12. 12.Usha Devi(Not Applicable)

  13. 13.Suman Lata(Not Applicable)

  14. 14.Rajinder Kumari(Not Applicable)

  15. 15.Saroj Bala(Not Applicable)

  16. 16.Kaushalya Devi(Not Applicable)

  17. 17.Darshan Lal(Not Applicable)

  18. 18.Harbans Lal(Not Applicable)

  19. 19.Jaswinder Singh(Not Applicable)

  20. 20.Mehar Singh(Not Applicable)

  21. 21.Raj Rani(Not Applicable)

  22. 22.Shyama Devi(Not Applicable)

  23. 23.Om Parkash(Not Applicable)

  24. 24.Saroj Bala(Not Applicable)

  25. 25.Chanchal Devi(Not Applicable)

  26. 26.Mukhtiar Singh(Not Applicable)

  27. 27.Raksha Devi(Not Applicable)

  28. 28.Shakuntla Devi(Not Applicable)

  29. 29.Nirmala Devi(Not Applicable)

  30. 30.Santosh Kumari Sandal(Not Applicable)

  31. 31.Parveen Lata(Not Applicable)

  32. 32.Subhadra Devi(Not Applicable)

  33. 33.Shakuntla Devi(Not Applicable)

  34. 34.Asha Devi(Not Applicable)

  35. 35.Roshan Lal(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rangil Singh,AG 1123

  2. 2.Secretary (Finance)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Director Health Services(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Chief Medical Officer Una,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Block Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Block Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Block Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Block Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Blok Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  10. 10.Accountant General,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of this writ petition without deciding the merits, directing that the petitioners' claim for revised leave encashment arrears following 2016 pay scale revision shall be governed by the Division Bench's decision in a related case (CWP No. 8504 of 2025), which will be binding on all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Sep-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 24-Jul-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 16-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  6. 08-Apr-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  7. 07-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  8. 28-Oct-2024

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  9. 21-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  10. 21-Jun-2024

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

  11. 19-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5642/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of this writ petition without deciding the merits, directing that the petitioners' claim for revised leave encashment arrears following 2016 pay scale revision shall be governed by the Division Bench's decision in a related case (CWP No. 8504 of 2025), which will be binding on all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case