BACK TO LIFE FOUNDATION, DRUG COUNSELLING AND REHABILITATION CENTER(Not Applicable) vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HP STATE MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY-CUM- SR. SUPERINTENDENT(Not Applicable) — FAO /95/2025

Case under Mental Health Act, 1987 Section 69,83. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HPHC010255532025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

FAO /21682/2025

Filing Date

07-05-2025

Registration No

FAO /95/2025

Registration Date

07-05-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

MENTAL HEALTH ACT, 1987 Section 69,83

Petitioner(s)

BACK TO LIFE FOUNDATION, DRUG COUNSELLING AND REHABILITATION CENTER(Not Applicable)

Adv. HR Jhingta, ,Rakesh Thakur

Respondent(s)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HP STATE MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY-CUM- SR. SUPERINTENDENT(Not Applicable)

Adv. AG 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

09-05-2025

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

25-03-2026

ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE

05-03-2026

ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE

22-12-2025

ORDERS

18-08-2025

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Summary: In FAOs No.95, 161 & 173 of 2025 (Back to Life Foundation vs. Chief Executive Officer), the court granted the Additional Advocate General two weeks' further time to file the reply in CMP No.32052/2025. The cases are adjourned and listed for consideration after two weeks, with the interim order to continue in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In FAOs No.95, 161 & 173 of 2025 (Back to Life Foundation vs. Chief Executive Officer), the court granted the Additional Advocate General two weeks' further time to file the reply in CMP No.32052/2025. The cases are adjourned and listed for consideration after two weeks, with the interim order to continue in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case