OM KRISHAN(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6577/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010255012026

Filing Number

CWP/22179/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/6577/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OM KRISHAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajesh Kumar,Rakesh Chauhan,Rakesh Chauhan, ,Rakesh Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director, of Higher Education(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 6577/2026 Om Krishan vs. State of H.P. and Others The court granted interim relief by staying the office order dated 06.01.2026, which proposed issuing a fresh charge-sheet against the petitioner (a school clerk). The court found prima facie that the disciplinary authority's decision to issue a new charge-sheet contradicted its earlier show-cause notice of 31.10.2025, which had marked his judicial custody period (19.01.2022-17.01.2024) as "DIES-NON." The petition was listed for 01.06.2026, with respondents granted four weeks to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6577/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 6577/2026 Om Krishan vs. State of H.P. and Others The court granted interim relief by staying the office order dated 06.01.2026, which proposed issuing a fresh charge-sheet against the petitioner (a school clerk). The court found prima facie that the disciplinary authority's decision to issue a new charge-sheet contradicted its earlier show-cause notice of 31.10.2025, which had marked his judicial custody period (19.01.2022-17.01.2024) as "DIES-NON." The petition was listed for 01.06.2026, with respondents granted four weeks to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case