BALBIR SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8268/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010254652026

Filing Number

CWP/22143/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/8268/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALBIR SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Tek Ram Sharma,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Engineer-in-Chief,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Superintending Engineer,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Executive Engineer(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.The Principal Accountant General(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Balbir Singh's petition seeking Rs. 5,52,233/- in pay revision arrears from 1.1.2016 by directing that the decision in the pending Division Bench case (CWP No. 8504 of 2025, Madhu Deshta and others) on identical issues shall be binding on all parties. The court declined to adjudicate separately, instead staying the proceedings pending the Division Bench's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Balbir Singh's petition seeking Rs. 5,52,233/- in pay revision arrears from 1.1.2016 by directing that the decision in the pending Division Bench case (CWP No. 8504 of 2025, Madhu Deshta and others) on identical issues shall be binding on all parties. The court declined to adjudicate separately, instead staying the proceedings pending the Division Bench's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case