SUDESH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sanjay Dalmla, AG,Sanjay Dalmla — CRMMO/409/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010254592026

Filing Number

CRMMO/3312/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/409/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDESH KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Janak Raj,Abhinav Mehta,Abhinav Mehta, ,Abhinav Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sanjay Dalmla, AG,Sanjay Dalmla

  2. 2.State of HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMMO/409/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Sudesh Kumar's petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his time extension request for depositing 20% compensation in a cheque bounce (Section 138 NI Act) case. Finding no illegality in the lower court's order citing the 90-day extension limit, the court granted one final week to deposit the amount, warning that failure would result in execution of the conviction order without further opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/409/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMMO/409/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Sudesh Kumar's petition challenging the lower court's rejection of his time extension request for depositing 20% compensation in a cheque bounce (Section 138 NI Act) case. Finding no illegality in the lower court's order citing the 90-day extension limit, the court granted one final week to deposit the amount, warning that failure would result in execution of the conviction order without further opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case