M/S NIKVIN HEALTHCARE INDIA PVT LTD(Not Applicable) vs UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6570/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010250302026
Filing Number
CWP/21757/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/6570/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S NIKVIN HEALTHCARE INDIA PVT LTD(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ajay Thakur,Avneesh Bhardwaj,Avneesh Bhardwaj, ,Aprajita,Avneesh Bhardwaj
Respondent(s)
-
1.UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. DSGI,AG 1123
-
2.Union of India(Not Applicable)
-
3.Union of India(Not Applicable)
-
4.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP 6570/2026 M/S Nikvin Healthcare India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by applying the directions from the precedent case *Atul Sharma v. Union of India* (CWP 10600/2024), which had been affirmed by higher courts. The petitioner sought quashing of letters denying final approval for Industrial Development Scheme (IDS) 2017 benefits and mandamus for acceptance of its application and claim for incentives. Since both counsels agreed the relief had already been adjudicated in the earlier case, the court applied those directions mutatis mutandis to this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6570/2026
Case Summary: CWP 6570/2026 M/S Nikvin Healthcare India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by applying the directions from the precedent case *Atul Sharma v. Union of India* (CWP 10600/2024), which had been affirmed by higher courts. The petitioner sought quashing of letters denying final approval for Industrial Development Scheme (IDS) 2017 benefits and mandamus for acceptance of its application and claim for incentives. Since both counsels agreed the relief had already been adjudicated in the earlier case, the court applied those directions mutatis mutandis to this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts