ARCHANA SOOD AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — EX.P./1079/2026

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010249542026

Filing Number

EX.P./21691/2026

Filing Date

25-Apr-2026

Registration No

EX.P./1079/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARCHANA SOOD AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mohamed Ahamed Safee,Pranav Kumar Kaushal,Pranav Kumar Kaushal, ,Sameer Miyan,Pranav Kumar Kaushal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition after the Director of School Education issued an office order (11.06.2026) granting revised emoluments on contract basis per the 12.01.2022 notification, with school principals directed to fix the petitioners' pay for their contract service period. The court imposed an eight-week deadline for arrear release, permitting revival of the petition if arrears remain unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./1079/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition after the Director of School Education issued an office order (11.06.2026) granting revised emoluments on contract basis per the 12.01.2022 notification, with school principals directed to fix the petitioners' pay for their contract service period. The court imposed an eight-week deadline for arrear release, permitting revival of the petition if arrears remain unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case