USHA KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — COPC/706/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010246862026
Filing Number
COPC/21453/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
COPC/706/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.USHA KUMARI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mamta Garg
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Sh. Ashish Kohli(Not Applicable)
-
3.Smt. Naresh Chandel(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
Case Summary: COPC No. 706/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition after the respondents submitted instructions dated 15.06.2026 demonstrating full compliance with directions issued in the earlier judgment (CWP No. 6835 of 2025). Justice Virender Singh found no further orders necessary and disposed of the petition accordingly, while permitting the petitioner liberty to approach the court again if grievances remained unaddressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
03-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/706/2026
Case Summary: COPC No. 706/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition after the respondents submitted instructions dated 15.06.2026 demonstrating full compliance with directions issued in the earlier judgment (CWP No. 6835 of 2025). Justice Virender Singh found no further orders necessary and disposed of the petition accordingly, while permitting the petitioner liberty to approach the court again if grievances remained unaddressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts