Phagan Dei(Not Applicable) vs HPSFC(Not Applicable) Advocate - Kiran Dhiman, ,Kiran Dhiman,AG — CMP-T/217/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010245802026

Filing Number

CMP-T/21366/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP-T/217/2026

Registration Date

23-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Phagan Dei(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Chander Narayan Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HPSFC(Not Applicable) Advocate - Kiran Dhiman, ,Kiran Dhiman,AG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of Phagan Dei's petition, applying the precedent from Urmila Devi case. The court directed that the petitioner's late husband, Kewal Ram, be granted work charge status after 8 years of daily wage service with regularization effective 08.07.1999, including all consequential benefits. However, notional benefits apply from that date while actual financial benefits are limited to 3 years prior to petition filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP-T/217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of Phagan Dei's petition, applying the precedent from Urmila Devi case. The court directed that the petitioner's late husband, Kewal Ram, be granted work charge status after 8 years of daily wage service with regularization effective 08.07.1999, including all consequential benefits. However, notional benefits apply from that date while actual financial benefits are limited to 3 years prior to petition filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case