RAJNI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8246/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010244652026

Filing Number

CWP/21251/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/8246/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJNI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Amit Kumar Dhumal

  2. 2.Diksha Kumari,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Rekha Kumari(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Diksha Rani,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Virender Kumar,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Kuldeep Singh,(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Baby(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 8246/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Rajni and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioners' representation (Annexure P-3) within 12 weeks, passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court did not provide substantive relief but remitted the matter for administrative consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8246/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 8246/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Rajni and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioners' representation (Annexure P-3) within 12 weeks, passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court did not provide substantive relief but remitted the matter for administrative consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case