PREM SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs INDIRA SHARMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — FAO(OS)/9/2026
Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section O47R1(c). Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010244352026
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
FAO(OS)/21223/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
FAO(OS)/9/2026
Registration Date
02-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PREM SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Karan Sharma
Smt. Kaushalya Devi(Not Applicable)
Sh. Gopal Singh(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
INDIRA SHARMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Sh. Bhupender(Not Applicable)
Sh. Bhopesh(Not Applicable)
Smt. Geeta(Not Applicable)
Smt. Tripta(Not Applicable)
Smt. Leela Wati,(Not Applicable)
Karam Dass,(Not Applicable)
Sh. Amar Jyot Singh,(Not Applicable)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
OFFICE OBJECTION
OFFICE OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | OFFICE OBJECTION |
| 30-06-2026 | OFFICE OBJECTION |
Orders
FAO(OS) No. 09/2026 - Summary Outcome: Appeal partially allowed and notice issued to respondents. Appellants must deposit Rs. 50,000 costs within two weeks; case returnable on 30.06.2026. If costs not deposited timely, appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution. The court found sufficient grounds for restoration despite earlier dismissal by the Single Judge, considering substantial progress in the suit (pending since 2012) and medical reasons for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
FAO(OS) No. 09/2026 - Summary Outcome: Appeal partially allowed and notice issued to respondents. Appellants must deposit Rs. 50,000 costs within two weeks; case returnable on 30.06.2026. If costs not deposited timely, appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution. The court found sufficient grounds for restoration despite earlier dismissal by the Single Judge, considering substantial progress in the suit (pending since 2012) and medical reasons for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts