RAM LAL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/760/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010240812026

Filing Number

CRMPM/3149/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/760/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM LAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. G R Palsra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMPM/760/2026 The court granted Ram Lal's application for condonation of delay in filing his petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate, but resulted from circumstances beyond the petitioner's control, and therefore sufficiently explained. Pending the next hearing, the department may proceed with departmental proceedings, but the ₹50,000 compensation awarded by the lower court shall not be recovered from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/760/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMPM/760/2026 The court granted Ram Lal's application for condonation of delay in filing his petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate, but resulted from circumstances beyond the petitioner's control, and therefore sufficiently explained. Pending the next hearing, the department may proceed with departmental proceedings, but the ₹50,000 compensation awarded by the lower court shall not be recovered from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case