BHAGMAL(Not Applicable) vs USHA GULERIA(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/471/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010239782026

Filing Number

CRMMO/3143/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/471/2026

Registration Date

16-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAGMAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar Suri,Dhananjay Singh,Dhananjay Singh, ,Dhananjay Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.USHA GULERIA(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMMO/471/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed respondent Bhagmal's petition challenging maintenance orders favoring petitioner Usha Guleria. The court found that Usha had valid grounds to reside separately after Bhagmal solemnized a second marriage with Ishwari Devi (evidenced by their daughter Muskan born in 2002), and that Bhagmal possessed sufficient means through his business and rental properties to pay ₹10,000 monthly maintenance plus an earlier awarded ₹2,000, totaling ₹12,000—reasonable given state minimum wages and his income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 18-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/471/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMMO/471/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed respondent Bhagmal's petition challenging maintenance orders favoring petitioner Usha Guleria. The court found that Usha had valid grounds to reside separately after Bhagmal solemnized a second marriage with Ishwari Devi (evidenced by their daughter Muskan born in 2002), and that Bhagmal possessed sufficient means through his business and rental properties to pay ₹10,000 monthly maintenance plus an earlier awarded ₹2,000, totaling ₹12,000—reasonable given state minimum wages and his income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case