DYANAND SHARMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3749/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010236862019

Filing Number

CWP/18510/2019

Filing Date

25-Sep-2019

Registration No

CWP/3749/2019

Registration Date

23-Nov-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DYANAND SHARMA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajiv Rai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,ASGI,AG 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

    Summary: In CWP No. 3749 of 2019, the court adjourned the matter on the petitioner's request and listed it for hearing in November 2026. The judge noted that the petitioner appeared disinterested in early hearing, despite an earlier application for expedited hearing being allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 17-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 22-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF

  6. 22-Jun-2022

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia

  7. 01-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF

  8. 18-Dec-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop ChitkaraView PDF

  9. 18-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3749/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In CWP No. 3749 of 2019, the court adjourned the matter on the petitioner's request and listed it for hearing in November 2026. The judge noted that the petitioner appeared disinterested in early hearing, despite an earlier application for expedited hearing being allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case