Attar Singh(Not Applicable) vs H.P. State Co-operative and Rural Development Bank(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ishaan Kashyap — CRMMO/432/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010235492026

Filing Number

CRMMO/3120/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/432/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Attar Singh(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Srishti Negi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.P. State Co-operative and Rural Development Bank(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ishaan Kashyap

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Attar Singh's petition challenging the dismissal of his time extension application in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. Although the court found no illegality in the lower court's dismissal order (which rejected his extension request filed over three months late), it granted him a final two-week deadline to deposit 20% of the compensation amount as previously ordered, with a warning that failure to comply would result in execution of the trial court's judgment without further opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Attar Singh's petition challenging the dismissal of his time extension application in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. Although the court found no illegality in the lower court's dismissal order (which rejected his extension request filed over three months late), it granted him a final two-week deadline to deposit 20% of the compensation amount as previously ordered, with a warning that failure to comply would result in execution of the trial court's judgment without further opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case