RAJESH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs HPSEB LTD AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) Advocate - Virender Singh Kanwar, ,Anil Kumar God — CWP/2633/2020
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th August 2020.
CNR: HPHC010230872020
Filing Number
CWP/20397/2020
Filing Date
06-Jul-2020
Registration No
CWP/2633/2020
Registration Date
30-Jul-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-Aug-2020
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Gupta,Abhendra Gupta,Abhendra Gupta, ,Abhendra Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.HPSEB LTD AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) Advocate - Virender Singh Kanwar, ,Anil Kumar God
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
The court dismissed the petition as disposed, finding that HPSEB Ltd. had complied with the mandate issued in the original judgment dated 07.08.2020. No further orders were required since the respondent had fulfilled all obligations previously ordered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
-
22-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
-
22-Apr-2026
Revoked
-
22-Apr-2026
Revoked
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
12-Oct-2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
07-Aug-2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
07-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/2633/2020
The court dismissed the petition as disposed, finding that HPSEB Ltd. had complied with the mandate issued in the original judgment dated 07.08.2020. No further orders were required since the respondent had fulfilled all obligations previously ordered by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts