BIMLA DEVI(Not Applicable) vs MANGO RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, YASH PAL SINGH DHAULTA — RSA/508/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010230282016

Filing Number

RSA/20508/2016

Filing Date

07-Nov-2016

Registration No

RSA/508/2016

Registration Date

24-Nov-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL ( 16 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ARISING OUT OF SUITS FOR DECLARATION AND /OR INJUNCTION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIMLA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ajay Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANGO RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, YASH PAL SINGH DHAULTA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    In RSA No. 508/2016, Bimla Devi & ors. vs. Mango Ram & ors., the case was heard on May 7, 2026. The court noted that the power of attorney on behalf of the appellant was not filed and directed the necessary documentation to be completed within three weeks, after which the case was adjourned for listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  4. 22-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya

  5. 29-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  6. 29-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur

  7. 04-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF

  8. 06-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Dec-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  10. 07-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/508/2016

casestatus.in Summary

In RSA No. 508/2016, Bimla Devi & ors. vs. Mango Ram & ors., the case was heard on May 7, 2026. The court noted that the power of attorney on behalf of the appellant was not filed and directed the necessary documentation to be completed within three weeks, after which the case was adjourned for listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case