SANGEETA SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5799/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010224892026

Filing Number

CWP/19472/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/5799/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGEETA SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinod Chauhan,Nandita,Nandita, ,Aanchal Singh,Nandita

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,Tek Ram Sharma 1123

  2. 2.The State of Himachal Pradesh through the Secretary (Health)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Director of health Services(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Director, Treasuries, Accounts and Lotteries,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.The District Treasury Officer, Treasuries, Accounts and Lotteries,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Accountant General (A and E)(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Sangeeta Sharma's writ petition without examining its merits, directing the competent authority to decide her pending representation (Annexure P-2) within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5799/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Sangeeta Sharma's writ petition without examining its merits, directing the competent authority to decide her pending representation (Annexure P-2) within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case