THAKUR YASHPAL KARYANA STORE AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs HP GRAMIN BANK(Not Applicable) Advocate - Kulbhushan Khajuria — CR.R/245/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 & 442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010216352026

Filing Number

CR.R/2883/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

CR.R/245/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 & 442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKUR YASHPAL KARYANA STORE AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Tyagi,Divya Rajta,Divya Rajta, ,Divya Rajta

  2. 2.Yashpal Thakur(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Tyagi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HP GRAMIN BANK(Not Applicable) Advocate - Kulbhushan Khajuria

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR.R 245/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Thakur Yashpal Karyana Store and Yashpal Thakur against HP Gramin Bank. The parties reached a settlement, and the Bank's counsel withdrew the complaint. The Court set aside the conviction judgment dated 26.10.2024 and dismissed the complaint as not pressed. The Court ordered ₹1,65,000 deposited in the trial court to be disbursed to the respondent/complainant via bank transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/245/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.R 245/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Thakur Yashpal Karyana Store and Yashpal Thakur against HP Gramin Bank. The parties reached a settlement, and the Bank's counsel withdrew the complaint. The Court set aside the conviction judgment dated 26.10.2024 and dismissed the complaint as not pressed. The Court ordered ₹1,65,000 deposited in the trial court to be disbursed to the respondent/complainant via bank transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case