SURESH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs SANJAY GUPTA AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/580/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10&12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010214312026

Filing Number

COPC/18563/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

COPC/580/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10&12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Neha Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY GUPTA AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,AG 1123

  2. 2.Sh. Hemis Negi(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Suresh Kumar's contempt petition after finding that the Competent Authority had complied with the Court's earlier directions by examining and rejecting his representation dated 13.01.2025 through an order dated 16.05.2026. The Court found no further orders necessary and closed the petition, while permitting the petitioner to challenge the rejection order through appropriate legal remedies if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 18-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Suresh Kumar's contempt petition after finding that the Competent Authority had complied with the Court's earlier directions by examining and rejecting his representation dated 13.01.2025 through an order dated 16.05.2026. The Court found no further orders necessary and closed the petition, while permitting the petitioner to challenge the rejection order through appropriate legal remedies if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case