STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) AG vs Roshan Lal(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/558/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010210852026

Filing Number

CMP.M/18246/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP.M/558/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) AG

  2. 2.The Engineer in Chief(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The executive Engineer(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshan Lal(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia,hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP(M) No.558 of 2026 The court condoned a 58-day delay in filing the State's appeal. On the main petition, the court issued notice to respondent Roshan Lal and stayed the operation of the impugned judgment dated 07.10.2016, noting that the Single Judge's relief grant may not have adequately considered the State's arguments regarding prior orders and representation procedures spanning from 2004-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/558/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP(M) No.558 of 2026 The court condoned a 58-day delay in filing the State's appeal. On the main petition, the court issued notice to respondent Roshan Lal and stayed the operation of the impugned judgment dated 07.10.2016, noting that the Single Judge's relief grant may not have adequately considered the State's arguments regarding prior orders and representation procedures spanning from 2004-2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case