SHYAMA AGGARWAL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5130/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010206522026

Filing Number

CWP/17885/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/5130/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAMA AGGARWAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinod Chauhan,Aanchal Singh,Aanchal Singh, ,Aanchal Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Department of Land Record(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Sub-Divisional Collector(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Shyama Aggarwal challenging her transfer order, directing that if she files a representation for adjustment to another station within one week, the authorities must decide within two weeks. The petitioner is exempted from joining the transferred station until then and may avail her due leave, with the Panchayati Raj election transfer ban not obstructing consideration of her representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5130/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Shyama Aggarwal challenging her transfer order, directing that if she files a representation for adjustment to another station within one week, the authorities must decide within two weeks. The petitioner is exempted from joining the transferred station until then and may avail her due leave, with the Panchayati Raj election transfer ban not obstructing consideration of her representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case