SHOBHU RAM(Not Applicable) vs MANAGING DIRECTOR, HRTC AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5136/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010206502026

Filing Number

CWP/17883/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/5136/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHU RAM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rakesh Kumar Sharma,Ishaan Kashyap,Ishaan Kashyap, ,Ishaan Kashyap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANAGING DIRECTOR, HRTC AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Deepak Sharma 1123

  2. 2.The Executive Director Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the petition by accepting the respondents' undertaking to pass appropriate orders within two weeks on the petitioner's representation regarding his transfer. The petitioner, a 100% blind HRTC employee promoted to Superintendent Grade-II, challenged his transfer from Solan to Dharamshala Unit without accommodation at his station of choice. The court granted relief by staying the transfer order pending final decision and allowing the petitioner to avail leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5136/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the petition by accepting the respondents' undertaking to pass appropriate orders within two weeks on the petitioner's representation regarding his transfer. The petitioner, a 100% blind HRTC employee promoted to Superintendent Grade-II, challenged his transfer from Solan to Dharamshala Unit without accommodation at his station of choice. The court granted relief by staying the transfer order pending final decision and allowing the petitioner to avail leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case