MANJU DEVI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6501/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010206162025
Filing Number
CWP/17530/2025
Filing Date
11-Apr-2025
Registration No
CWP/6501/2025
Registration Date
21-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJU DEVI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. Prem Parkash Chauhan,Shikha Gupta,Shikha Gupta, ,Tara Devi,Shikha Rajta
-
2.. Meena Kumari(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Director of Elementary Education,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by directing the petitioners to file an appropriate representation with the competent authority within four weeks, which must be decided in accordance with law within 12 weeks thereafter by passing a speaking order. The court accepted the petitioners' counsel's request to allow administrative remedies before the authority rather than adjudicating the matter itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Dec-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
17-Jun-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
11-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6501/2025
Case Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by directing the petitioners to file an appropriate representation with the competent authority within four weeks, which must be decided in accordance with law within 12 weeks thereafter by passing a speaking order. The court accepted the petitioners' counsel's request to allow administrative remedies before the authority rather than adjudicating the matter itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts