MAMTA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5089/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010201492026
Filing Number
CWP/17465/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/5089/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAMTA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Hirdaya Ram,R K Bansal,R K Bansal, ,Sonia Saini,Suresh Singh Saini,R K Bansal
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Sarthak Upadhyay,AG 1123
-
2.The Deputy Commissioner(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Block Development Officer Development(Not Applicable)
-
4.Gram Panchayat Koti Dhiman Development Block Dadahu(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
18-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
Summary: In CWP No.5089 of 2026 (Mamta v. State of Himachal Pradesh), the court found that replies filed by respondents were not on record and directed respondent's counsel to remove any objections for placing replies on record. The petitioner was granted one week to file rejoinders, and the case was adjourned for consideration on 18.05.2026. Additionally, CMP No.7297 of 2026 was disposed of in terms of a previous order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/5089/2026
Summary: In CWP No.5089 of 2026 (Mamta v. State of Himachal Pradesh), the court found that replies filed by respondents were not on record and directed respondent's counsel to remove any objections for placing replies on record. The petitioner was granted one week to file rejoinders, and the case was adjourned for consideration on 18.05.2026. Additionally, CMP No.7297 of 2026 was disposed of in terms of a previous order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts