KRISHAN KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/1724/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010201282020

Filing Number

CWP/17838/2020

Filing Date

10-Jun-2020

Registration No

CWP/1724/2020

Registration Date

10-Jun-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Karan Singh Parmar,Mohit Dogra,Mohit Dogra, ,Rashmi Parmar,Kush Sharma,Abhishek Thakur,Mohit Dogra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Krishan Kumar's petition and directed the State to re-engage him as DPE (Director of Physical Education) at Government Senior Secondary School, Saddun Bargran, citing parity with a similarly-situated teacher (Bal Ram) whose re-engagement the court had previously ordered based on an inquiry committee's recommendation. However, the court denied the petitioner monetary benefits for the period of non-service, limiting consequential benefits to regularization under applicable policy, with a three-month compliance deadline and 6% annual interest penalty if not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 17-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  9. 16-May-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  10. 07-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  11. 10-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  12. 10-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  13. 27-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  14. 27-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  15. 11-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  16. 11-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  17. 14-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  18. 31-Aug-2023

    Honourable The Chief Justice Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  19. 27-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  20. 05-Nov-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  21. 05-Nov-2020

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  22. 23-Jul-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  23. 23-Jul-2020

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  24. 11-Jun-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  25. 11-Jun-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 10-Jun-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1724/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Krishan Kumar's petition and directed the State to re-engage him as DPE (Director of Physical Education) at Government Senior Secondary School, Saddun Bargran, citing parity with a similarly-situated teacher (Bal Ram) whose re-engagement the court had previously ordered based on an inquiry committee's recommendation. However, the court denied the petitioner monetary benefits for the period of non-service, limiting consequential benefits to regularization under applicable policy, with a three-month compliance deadline and 6% annual interest penalty if not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case