RAMESH CHAND AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/464/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010199432026

Filing Number

COPC/17278/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

COPC/464/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH CHAND AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar

  2. 2.Anit Kumar(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat 1123

  2. 2.Maneet Verma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the petition filed by Ramesh Chand and another alleging non-compliance with a prior judgment dated 7.10.2025. While the respondents had already paid DCRG and leave encashment to the petitioners, the court found that interest remained unpaid. The respondents undertook to pay the outstanding interest within eight weeks, upon which the court closed the petition while preserving the petitioners' right to revive proceedings if any grievances remain unaddressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/464/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the petition filed by Ramesh Chand and another alleging non-compliance with a prior judgment dated 7.10.2025. While the respondents had already paid DCRG and leave encashment to the petitioners, the court found that interest remained unpaid. The respondents undertook to pay the outstanding interest within eight weeks, upon which the court closed the petition while preserving the petitioners' right to revive proceedings if any grievances remain unaddressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case