ARVIND KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6766/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010195992026

Filing Number

CWP/16974/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/6766/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Yogesh Kumar Chandel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of HP(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Deputy Director,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 6776/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition filed by Ajay Kumar Badrel against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the Competent Authority to sympathetically consider and decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-4) by passing a reasoned order within 8 weeks, in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6766/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 6776/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition filed by Ajay Kumar Badrel against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the Competent Authority to sympathetically consider and decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-4) by passing a reasoned order within 8 weeks, in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case