SHER SINGH(Not Applicable) vs UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5060/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010195232026
Filing Number
CWP/16900/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/5060/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHER SINGH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sangeeta Bandhu
Respondent(s)
-
1.UOI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG,Kulbhushan Khajuria,Jai Ram Sharma,DSGI 1123
-
2.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Deputy Commissioner(Not Applicable)
-
4.The Secretary,(Not Applicable)
-
5.Additional Rajasthan.(Not Applicable)
-
6.The District Collector(Not Applicable)
-
7.District Collector(Not Applicable)
-
8.Sub-Divisional Officer Tehsil Chattargarh-2 Bikaner,(Not Applicable)
-
9.Chairman BBMB 19-B,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner, Sher Singh, to file a representation before the High Power Committee within four weeks, which must decide the matter within three months thereafter. The court applied the precedent set in Bakshi Ram v. Union of India (2013), permitting grievances related to dam displacement to be addressed by the high power committee with detailed individual consideration and timely communication of the decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/5060/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner, Sher Singh, to file a representation before the High Power Committee within four weeks, which must decide the matter within three months thereafter. The court applied the precedent set in Bakshi Ram v. Union of India (2013), permitting grievances related to dam displacement to be addressed by the high power committee with detailed individual consideration and timely communication of the decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts