AVTAR SINGH(Not Applicable) BINDIYA , ,Vidushi Sharma vs KAMAL DEV(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sunny Dhatwalia, ,Kashmir Singh Thakur,Harjeet Singh Suneel — RSA/411/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010193692016
Filing Number
RSA/20423/2016
Filing Date
15-Sep-2016
Registration No
RSA/411/2016
Registration Date
24-Sep-2016
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Bench Type
Single
Category
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVTAR SINGH(Not Applicable) BINDIYA , ,Vidushi Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAMAL DEV(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sunny Dhatwalia, ,Kashmir Singh Thakur,Harjeet Singh Suneel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
Case Summary: RSA 411/2016 - Avtar Singh v. Kamal Dev Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the appeal and upheld the lower courts' judgments, granting the plaintiff (Kamal Dev) a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant (Avtar Singh) from interfering with the suit land and ordering demolition of unauthorized construction encroaching on it. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant's own admissions in his written statement established the plaintiff's co-ownership and possession rights over the disputed land (Khasra No. 1490). A Local Commissioner's demarcation report confirmed the defendant had encroached with construction on two marlas of the suit land. The defendant's argument that he wasn't present during demarcation was rejected because his father accepted the notice as the defendant's power of attorney and signed the demarcation documents, effectively binding the defendant to the findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
01-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
25-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur
-
02-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF
-
02-Jun-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur
-
07-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF
-
01-Aug-2019
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
16-May-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
30-Apr-2019
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
12-Apr-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
12-Apr-2019
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
05-Jan-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
05-Jan-2019
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
06-Dec-2018
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
10-Oct-2018
Orders
Additional Registrar(j)
-
16-Jul-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
19-Jun-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
23-May-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
- 26-Mar-2018
-
14-Mar-2018
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
06-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2017
Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF
-
19-Jul-2017
Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF
-
26-May-2017
Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF
-
18-Apr-2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
22-Mar-2017
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
27-Dec-2016
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
30-Nov-2016
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
28-Sep-2016
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
15-Sep-2016
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/411/2016
Case Summary: RSA 411/2016 - Avtar Singh v. Kamal Dev Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the appeal and upheld the lower courts' judgments, granting the plaintiff (Kamal Dev) a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant (Avtar Singh) from interfering with the suit land and ordering demolition of unauthorized construction encroaching on it. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant's own admissions in his written statement established the plaintiff's co-ownership and possession rights over the disputed land (Khasra No. 1490). A Local Commissioner's demarcation report confirmed the defendant had encroached with construction on two marlas of the suit land. The defendant's argument that he wasn't present during demarcation was rejected because his father accepted the notice as the defendant's power of attorney and signed the demarcation documents, effectively binding the defendant to the findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts