BITTU RAM AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8211/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010190822026

Filing Number

CWP/16506/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/8211/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BITTU RAM AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Pawan Kumar Sharma,Tim Saran,Tim Saran, ,Tim Saran

  2. 2.Tej Singh(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Bittu Ram and another against the State of Himachal Pradesh, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-3) within 12 weeks by passing a detailed speaking order in accordance with law. The court did not adjudicate the substantive merits but remitted the matter for decision by the appropriate administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Bittu Ram and another against the State of Himachal Pradesh, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-3) within 12 weeks by passing a detailed speaking order in accordance with law. The court did not adjudicate the substantive merits but remitted the matter for decision by the appropriate administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case