RAVI DHIMAN(Not Applicable) vs M/S N.G. ENTERPRISES(Not Applicable) Advocate - Rakesh Thakur — CRMPM/585/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010186562026

Filing Number

CRMPM/2517/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/585/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI DHIMAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Munish Datwalia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S N.G. ENTERPRISES(Not Applicable) Advocate - Rakesh Thakur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the criminal revision petition and acquitted Ravi Dhiman of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, setting aside his conviction and four-month imprisonment sentence. The acquittal was granted based on a compromise reached between the petitioner and complainant on March 30, 2026, with the respondent receiving full compensation and withdrawing the complaint; the petitioner was ordered released from jail subject to depositing 10% of the cheque amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/585/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the criminal revision petition and acquitted Ravi Dhiman of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, setting aside his conviction and four-month imprisonment sentence. The acquittal was granted based on a compromise reached between the petitioner and complainant on March 30, 2026, with the respondent receiving full compensation and withdrawing the complaint; the petitioner was ordered released from jail subject to depositing 10% of the cheque amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case