BHIM SINGH(Not Applicable) vs ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — COPC/408/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010183392026

Filing Number

COPC/15826/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

COPC/408/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHIM SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Subhash Mohan Snehi,Bhavinta Kumari,Bhavinta Kumari, ,Bhavinta Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Sh. Narender Pal Singh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Er. Pradeep Singh Thakur(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary of COPC No.408 of 2026: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed contempt proceedings after the Executive Engineer B&R Division, HPPWD took action on the petitioner Bhim Singh's case through office orders dated 07.04.2026 and 08.04.2026, which resulted in reconsideration and re-fixation of the petitioner's pay. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedies for any surviving grievances in accordance with law and disposed of pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of COPC No.408 of 2026: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed contempt proceedings after the Executive Engineer B&R Division, HPPWD took action on the petitioner Bhim Singh's case through office orders dated 07.04.2026 and 08.04.2026, which resulted in reconsideration and re-fixation of the petitioner's pay. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedies for any surviving grievances in accordance with law and disposed of pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case