DESH RAJ(Not Applicable) vs THE DR.Y.S.P.U.H.F. AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — EX.P./1068/2026

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010182542026

Filing Number

EX.P./15741/2026

Filing Date

03-Apr-2026

Registration No

EX.P./1068/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DESH RAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rakesh Kumar Dogra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DR.Y.S.P.U.H.F. AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Ramesh Chand Sharma 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: EX.P. /1068/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Desh Raj's execution petition after the respondent (Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry) produced a consideration order dated 31.03.2026 demonstrating that the earlier judgment had been implemented. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to pursue further remedies for any remaining grievances through appropriate legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./1068/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EX.P. /1068/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Desh Raj's execution petition after the respondent (Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry) produced a consideration order dated 31.03.2026 demonstrating that the earlier judgment had been implemented. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to pursue further remedies for any remaining grievances through appropriate legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case