BALBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/438/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010182182026

Filing Number

COPC/15705/2026

Filing Date

03-Apr-2026

Registration No

COPC/438/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar

  2. 2.Pardeep Kumar(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Virender Singh Kanwar 1123

  2. 2.Maneet Verma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Summary: In this contempt petition, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh found partial non-compliance with its earlier judgment (CWP 10098/2025) directing payment of leave encashment and DCRG benefits to the petitioners. The court ordered the respondents to pay the outstanding DCRG amount to petitioner No. 1 with interest within three weeks, while acknowledging partial compliance. The petition was closed with liberty granted to the petitioners to revive it if the remaining grievances remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/438/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this contempt petition, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh found partial non-compliance with its earlier judgment (CWP 10098/2025) directing payment of leave encashment and DCRG benefits to the petitioners. The court ordered the respondents to pay the outstanding DCRG amount to petitioner No. 1 with interest within three weeks, while acknowledging partial compliance. The petition was closed with liberty granted to the petitioners to revive it if the remaining grievances remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case