ASHA RAM(Not Applicable) vs MEEN SINGH(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/570/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010179522026

Filing Number

CRMPM/2489/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/570/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHA RAM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEEN SINGH(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary: In Cr.MP(M) No.570 of 2026, the respondent was granted two weeks' time to file a reply, with the case listed for 03.06.2026. In Cr. Revision No.568 of 2024, the petitioner was granted an additional four weeks to deposit the remaining ₹3,00,000/- (after already depositing ₹5,80,000/-), failing which the petition will be decided on its merits; the petitioner must remain present on the next hearing date (03.06.2026). Cr.MP No.1615 of 2026 was disposed of as infructuous since the extension was already granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/570/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Cr.MP(M) No.570 of 2026, the respondent was granted two weeks' time to file a reply, with the case listed for 03.06.2026. In Cr. Revision No.568 of 2024, the petitioner was granted an additional four weeks to deposit the remaining ₹3,00,000/- (after already depositing ₹5,80,000/-), failing which the petition will be decided on its merits; the petitioner must remain present on the next hearing date (03.06.2026). Cr.MP No.1615 of 2026 was disposed of as infructuous since the extension was already granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case