ASHA RAM(Not Applicable) vs MEEN SINGH(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/570/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010179522026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRMPM/2489/2026
Filing Date
02-04-2026
Registration No
CRMPM/570/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHA RAM(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashok Kumar Thakur
Respondent(s)
MEEN SINGH(Not Applicable)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
OFFICE OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | OFFICE OBJECTION |
Orders
Summary: In Cr.MP(M) No.570 of 2026, the respondent was granted two weeks' time to file a reply, with the case listed for 03.06.2026. In Cr. Revision No.568 of 2024, the petitioner was granted an additional four weeks to deposit the remaining ₹3,00,000/- (after already depositing ₹5,80,000/-), failing which the petition will be decided on its merits; the petitioner must remain present on the next hearing date (03.06.2026). Cr.MP No.1615 of 2026 was disposed of as infructuous since the extension was already granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Cr.MP(M) No.570 of 2026, the respondent was granted two weeks' time to file a reply, with the case listed for 03.06.2026. In Cr. Revision No.568 of 2024, the petitioner was granted an additional four weeks to deposit the remaining ₹3,00,000/- (after already depositing ₹5,80,000/-), failing which the petition will be decided on its merits; the petitioner must remain present on the next hearing date (03.06.2026). Cr.MP No.1615 of 2026 was disposed of as infructuous since the extension was already granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts