NANDA DEVI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6563/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010176872026

Filing Number

CWP/15222/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/6563/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANDA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Madan Gopal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Deputy Commissioner,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer (Civil) Thunag,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Tehsildar,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Divisional Commissioner,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Smt. Kamla Devi,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 6563 of 2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Nanda Devi's writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner had challenged an order dated 07.11.2025 sanctioning ₹1,17,500 compensation to respondent No.6, alleging it was illegally disbursed based on false damage reports by revenue officials. After brief arguments, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw and pursue alternative remedies, which the court granted before dismissing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6563/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 6563 of 2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Nanda Devi's writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner had challenged an order dated 07.11.2025 sanctioning ₹1,17,500 compensation to respondent No.6, alleging it was illegally disbursed based on false damage reports by revenue officials. After brief arguments, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw and pursue alternative remedies, which the court granted before dismissing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case