PANKAJ KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5577/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010172792026

Filing Number

CWP/14881/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/5577/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMARI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Gurmeet Bhardwaj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The State of Himachal Pradesh through its Principal Secretary (Finance) to the Government of(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director General of Police, Police head Quarters Nigam Vihar,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Kullu,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitioner Pankaj Kumar's petition with directions that if he files a fresh representation within 4 weeks, the concerned authority must decide it within 8 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court's decision was based on the petitioner's earlier representation filed in 2025, and all pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5577/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitioner Pankaj Kumar's petition with directions that if he files a fresh representation within 4 weeks, the concerned authority must decide it within 8 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court's decision was based on the petitioner's earlier representation filed in 2025, and all pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case