RAJ KAMAL(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6207/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010170412025
Filing Number
CWP/14238/2025
Filing Date
04-Apr-2025
Registration No
CWP/6207/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJ KAMAL(Not Applicable)
Adv. Vishwa Bhushan,Tek Ram Sharma,Tek Ram Sharma, ,Tek Ram Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.The Director General of Police,(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Additional Director General of Police State (CID),(Not Applicable)
-
4.The Superintendent of Police, Crime-II, CID,(Not Applicable)
-
5.The District Treasury Officer,(Not Applicable)
-
6.The Accountant General,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
In CWP No.6207/2025, the court adjourned the case for four weeks. The petitioner Raj Kamal disputed the State's claim that only Rs.13,317/- was payable, asserting entitlement to a higher amount. The court granted time for the petitioner to file an affidavit detailing the correct amount owed, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
25-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
11-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
11-Apr-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
04-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6207/2025
In CWP No.6207/2025, the court adjourned the case for four weeks. The petitioner Raj Kamal disputed the State's claim that only Rs.13,317/- was payable, asserting entitlement to a higher amount. The court granted time for the petitioner to file an affidavit detailing the correct amount owed, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts