SUMIT KAPOOR(Not Applicable) vs ISHA THAKUR(Not Applicable) — COPC/593/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010168842026

Filing Number

COPC/14556/2026

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/593/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMIT KAPOOR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Atharv Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ISHA THAKUR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rajesh Kashyap 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Case Summary: COPC/593/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Sumit Kapoor's contempt petition after the respondent's counsel placed on record an order dated 20.04.2026 rejecting the petitioner's representation as devoid of merit. Justice Sushil Kukreja found no further orders necessary and closed the petition. However, the court reserved liberty for the petitioner to challenge the 20.04.2026 order through appropriate legal remedies if still aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 18-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/593/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COPC/593/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Sumit Kapoor's contempt petition after the respondent's counsel placed on record an order dated 20.04.2026 rejecting the petitioner's representation as devoid of merit. Justice Sushil Kukreja found no further orders necessary and closed the petition. However, the court reserved liberty for the petitioner to challenge the 20.04.2026 order through appropriate legal remedies if still aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case