ROSHAN LAL(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5588/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010165372026

Filing Number

CWP/14255/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/5588/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROSHAN LAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mohamed Ahamed Safee,Pranav Kumar Kaushal,Pranav Kumar Kaushal, ,Sameer Miyan,Pranav Kumar Kaushal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Education) to the Government of(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.3. The Director of School Education(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Deputy Director of School Education(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.The Principal Government Senior Secondary School Korga,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary of CWP No. 5588 of 2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Roshan Lal's petition with a directive that the Competent Authority decide his representation (Annexure P-5) within 12 weeks from the judgment date, in accordance with its contents. All pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5588/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP No. 5588 of 2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Roshan Lal's petition with a directive that the Competent Authority decide his representation (Annexure P-5) within 12 weeks from the judgment date, in accordance with its contents. All pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case