NARDEV DUTT(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3826/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010163692024

Filing Number

CWP/12868/2024

Filing Date

01-May-2024

Registration No

CWP/3826/2024

Registration Date

06-May-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARDEV DUTT(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Chander Narayan Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Susheel Gautam,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Chief Conservator of Forest(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Himachal Pradesh Natural Resources Management Society (HPNRMS) Solan,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The District Project Officer,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed Nardev Dutt's petition for work-charge status regularization after finding his case similar to Sant Ram's (decided by the Supreme Court). The court accepted the state's own admission in its reply that the petitioner's circumstances were identical to Sant Ram's, rejecting the state's later argument that they differed. The respondents were directed to grant all benefits within three months, with regularization effective from the original appointment date and actual benefits accruing three years before the petition filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Jun-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  4. 07-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 07-May-2024

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  6. 01-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3826/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed Nardev Dutt's petition for work-charge status regularization after finding his case similar to Sant Ram's (decided by the Supreme Court). The court accepted the state's own admission in its reply that the petitioner's circumstances were identical to Sant Ram's, rejecting the state's later argument that they differed. The respondents were directed to grant all benefits within three months, with regularization effective from the original appointment date and actual benefits accruing three years before the petition filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case