GULSHAN KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/317/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Next hearing 19-May-2026

CNR: HPHC010155632026

Filing Number

CRMMO/2138/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/317/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSHAN KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kuldeep Chand

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

  3. 3.SHO(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

  4. 4.Sunil Kumar Rana(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Chander Shekhar Thakur

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  3. 15-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  4. 15-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Summary: In Cr.MMO No.317 of 2026, the court adjourned the case to 15.05.2026. Notice was issued to respondent No.4 (returnable by 15.05.2026), while respondents No.1 to 3 (State) were directed to file their reply to the petition in the interim. No substantive order on bail or merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/317/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Cr.MMO No.317 of 2026, the court adjourned the case to 15.05.2026. Notice was issued to respondent No.4 (returnable by 15.05.2026), while respondents No.1 to 3 (State) were directed to file their reply to the petition in the interim. No substantive order on bail or merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case