NIRMAL SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5591/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010154692026

Filing Number

CWP/13338/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/5591/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMAL SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajat Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Finance) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director, School Education, Shimla,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Deputy Director School Education (Elementary),(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.The Block Elementary Block Rait at Shahpur, Tehsil Shahpur(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Nirmal Singh's petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-5) by passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law. The court granted the petitioner's prayer without elaborating on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5591/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Nirmal Singh's petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-5) by passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law. The court granted the petitioner's prayer without elaborating on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case