RATTAN CHAND(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3706/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010154192026

Filing Number

CWP/13296/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3706/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RATTAN CHAND(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Surya Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rajesh Prakash Om Prakash,AG 1123

  2. 2.Director(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Block development Office,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Surinder Bhardwaj(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 3706 of 2026, the court granted a stay on the petitioner Rattan Chand's transfer order dated 23.03.2026 and allowed him to continue performing duties at Gram Panchayat Kalhel, Development Block Tissa, finding merit in his contention that the transfer was made at the behest of respondent No. 5 without proper justification. The case is adjourned to 14.05.2026 for further hearing, with respondents directed to file replies, and the applicant directed to submit English translations of documents within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3706/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 3706 of 2026, the court granted a stay on the petitioner Rattan Chand's transfer order dated 23.03.2026 and allowed him to continue performing duties at Gram Panchayat Kalhel, Development Block Tissa, finding merit in his contention that the transfer was made at the behest of respondent No. 5 without proper justification. The case is adjourned to 14.05.2026 for further hearing, with respondents directed to file replies, and the applicant directed to submit English translations of documents within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case