CHAIN SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5796/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010153622026

Filing Number

CWP/13246/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/5796/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAIN SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Bonit Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Tek Ram Sharma,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Engineer-in-Chief, Jal Shakti Vibhag,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Executive Engineer, Shahnehar Project Division, Badukhar,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Principal Accountant General with headquarters(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of Chain Singh's writ petition without adjudicating the merits, directing the competent authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-3) within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court accepted the petitioner's submission that justice would be served through administrative reconsideration rather than judicial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5796/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of Chain Singh's writ petition without adjudicating the merits, directing the competent authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-3) within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court accepted the petitioner's submission that justice would be served through administrative reconsideration rather than judicial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case