MAMTA DEVI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5498/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010152322026

Filing Number

CWP/13127/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/5498/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMTA DEVI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mandeep Chandel

  2. 2.Smt. Neha Thakur, W/o Shri Ashish Kumar Patyal, aged about 36 years(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of HP through its Principal Secretary (Education)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director, Directorate of School Education to(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations (Annexure P-4) within 12 weeks, passing a reasoned speaking order in accordance with law. The court essentially remitted the matter back to the administrative authorities for proper consideration and adjudication of the petitioners' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5498/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioners' representations (Annexure P-4) within 12 weeks, passing a reasoned speaking order in accordance with law. The court essentially remitted the matter back to the administrative authorities for proper consideration and adjudication of the petitioners' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case