MAHILA MANDAL AND ORS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3547/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010147302026

Filing Number

CWP/12694/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3547/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHILA MANDAL AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Varun Thakur,Aakash Thakur,Aakash Thakur, ,Prem Chand,Aakash Thakur

  2. 2.Chander Kant Gautam(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Pappu Lal(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Govind Singh(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Bansi Lal(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Ranjeet(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of Panchayati Raj(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner Shimla(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.District Panchayat Officer, Shimla(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Block Development Officer, Rampur(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the delimitation notifications for 13 gram panchayats in multiple districts, finding that the state violated statutory procedures prescribed under the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act and Election Rules by curtailing the mandatory 7-day objection period to 3 days and finalizing delimitation without allowing proper appeal periods. The court directed the state to complete the roster notification by April 7, 2026, and complete elections by May 31, 2026, while imposing future guidelines requiring all panchayat reorganization to be completed at least six months before tenure expiry to allow adequate time for proper delimitation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the delimitation notifications for 13 gram panchayats in multiple districts, finding that the state violated statutory procedures prescribed under the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act and Election Rules by curtailing the mandatory 7-day objection period to 3 days and finalizing delimitation without allowing proper appeal periods. The court directed the state to complete the roster notification by April 7, 2026, and complete elections by May 31, 2026, while imposing future guidelines requiring all panchayat reorganization to be completed at least six months before tenure expiry to allow adequate time for proper delimitation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case