RAJESH SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3512/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010147292026

Filing Number

CWP/12693/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/3512/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Prem Chand,Aakash Thakur,Aakash Thakur, ,Varun Thakur,Aakash Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Chief Engineer, Kangra Zone(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Superintending Engineer(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Executive Engineer Division Palampur(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    In CWP No.3512/2026, the court stayed the operation of a transfer order dated 19.03.2026 against petitioner Rajesh Sharma, a Senior Assistant in HPPWD Division, Palampur. The court found the transfer improper as the petitioner was nearing superannuation within two years. The respondents were directed to allow the petitioner to continue his duties at his current posting. The main petition was admitted with respondents directed to file reply within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3512/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In CWP No.3512/2026, the court stayed the operation of a transfer order dated 19.03.2026 against petitioner Rajesh Sharma, a Senior Assistant in HPPWD Division, Palampur. The court found the transfer improper as the petitioner was nearing superannuation within two years. The respondents were directed to allow the petitioner to continue his duties at his current posting. The main petition was admitted with respondents directed to file reply within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case