GURJIT SINGH(Not Applicable) vs VIJAY PAL SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CR/23/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010146952026

Filing Number

CR/12662/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

CR/23/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURJIT SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Karun Negi,Somesh Sharma,Somesh Sharma, ,Somesh Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY PAL SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Ankit Kaloti 1123

  2. 2.Mangal Singh deceased through LRs Charan Dass and Ors.(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.HP state Industrial Corporatioin Ltd.(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Gurjit Singh's petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his application to consolidate three civil suits under Section 151 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's decision, finding that one suit had been pending for 17 years and the other two suits had already been dismissed in default, making consolidation inappropriate and rejecting the multiplicity of litigation argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/23/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Gurjit Singh's petition challenging the trial court's rejection of his application to consolidate three civil suits under Section 151 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's decision, finding that one suit had been pending for 17 years and the other two suits had already been dismissed in default, making consolidation inappropriate and rejecting the multiplicity of litigation argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case